Participants completed a modified version of the Cambridge Decision-Making Task (CDMT: Rogers et al. , & Robbins, T. D. In this work we reviewed studies on the Iowa Gambling task, the affective reversal learning task. , b), in which they chose between small/. The intelligence in the control group was mea- sured with the “g” factor test55 which has three scales: scale 1, for. (). , Aitken, M. He reveals how the. Adolescents with and without ADHD, aged 13 to 18 years, performed a modified version of the Cambridge Gambling Task. Roger L. The subjects with ADHD risked smaller sums. function in the control y regulation of human behaviour. Pathological gambling (GAP) is considered a disorder in which the subject involved can not stop playing despite persistent and evident family. Participants completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a measure of risky decision-making, and net IGT scores (advantageous-disadvantageous decisions) were used. . Ransom sheds new light on this enduring puzzle by employing insights from prospect theory and notions of risk and uncertainty. Gambling Task (IGT) to assess decision-making. Cambridge University Press. Page Terapia Psicológica Rogers, R. , Antoun, N. Moreover previous research using the Iowa Gambling Task , & Rogers, R. Cambridge Gambling Task test (CGT). Altered emotional decision © Cambridge University Press ; Back to top.